Season:
2008
The table is currently sorted by SUM.| Pos | Name | Members | Logo | C80 | C81 | C82 | C83 | C84 | C85 | C86 | C87 | C88 | C89 | C90 | CORR | SUM |
Latest results
| -2 days | Duplode | 1:13.38 | Jaguar |
| -2 days | Daniel3D | 1:39.93 | Jaguar |
| -2 days | Frieshansen | 1:11.84 | Jaguar |
| -2 days | Usrin | 1:14.17 | Jaguar |
| -2 days | Frieshansen | 1:13.42 | Jaguar |
Shoutbox
- Usrin
- @AlanRotoi, thanks for the kind invitation, my goal is to give a chance to all tracks and race if I find it fun. But still, you have answered only my first question, and seem to ignore the rest. So again... *** (2) If all replays were published at 00:00, we could immediately watch each other's replays and see if there is any problem with them. That's the best possible way of checking. (3) In the very unlikely case when a replay is found invalid, it is still possible to modify the result. Can you imagine that you have to wait one day for the medal ceremony after a Formula 1 race or an Olympic final, just because there is a chance for car irregularity or doping? (+1) If the invalid replay was not sent as hidden, it needs to be removed manually from the scoreboard ANYWAY, even with the current "verification" method.
- Alan Rotoi
- @Usrin you are trying to get it wrong every word. Take it easy. What I wrote is literally. Telling you "if you were more often" is an invitation to you to stay and race more often. Maybe is a language /chat issue, but don't get it wrong please. If you were here for example in the last race with Corvette you would find your questions answered. Now I also remember in the last years Corvette race (zct245?) we had another validation replay issue. I guess dreadaut stated as invalid my final replay. Now a side question, was it by chance or Corvette is a car that tends to be buggy?
- Usrin
- @Alan & @dreadnaut: So if someone doesn't come more "offer" (often?) for any reason, should he just shut up? Is your message the same to any newbie having these natural questions in the future? If the questions were really answered in the past, please give a link to the answer or repeat it for dummies like me. And last but not least, try to be less arrogant.
- Alan Rotoi
- @Usrin if you come more ofter you would find those questions answered. Besides the drama, I wanted Audi as the car of the month too but seems Jaguar was faster or at least better handy. Maybe zct255 is for Audi but Lambo is still an option because of the bonus.
- Usrin
- @dreadnaut: Only you know why you took it as an accusation of cheating. I only brought up the fact that the system is not transparent. So, what's the reason for not displaying the hidden replays automatically when time is up? All replays have to be "verified"? That would be a very poor argument... (1) Has it EVER happened that you found an invalid replay during the "verification"? (2) If all replays were published at 00:00, we could immediately watch each other's replays and see if there is any problem with them. That's the best possible way of checking. (3) In the very unlikely case when a replay is found invalid, it is still possible to modify the result. Can you imagine that you have to wait one day for the medal ceremony after a Formula 1 race or an Olympic final, just because there is a chance for car irregularity or doping?
- Usrin
-
Congratulations to everyone who is happy with his/her result! That was an exciting race, it's a pity that the Audi did not have a bit higher bonus.
- Duplode
- Congratulations to @Alan and @Frieshansen! And indeed, make sure to watch @Usrin's Audi replay as well!
- Frieshansen
-
Yeah! My first second place I owe this ranking to Alan´s tips and motivation. Congrats to @Alan and @Duplode Also to @Heretic for taking the lead in the Amateur league! @Usrin: really enjoyed your Audi-replay - so well driven and three magic carpets in a row!!
- Alan Rotoi
- Thank you guys! Congrats to @Frieshansen and @Duplode as well. Also congratulations to the amateur league podium, @Heretic, @Cas and @Kaweashkar who reached the podium in his very first race!
- dreadnaut
- Next track up later today, but most likely tomorrow 👀
© Zak McKracken & dreadnaut, 2001–2022