News

  1. dreadnaut

    Only a couple of days until ZCT300 😱

  2. dreadnaut

    Happy birthday @BonzaiJoe! 🎉

  3. Ryoma

    ss-21018.png

  4. Argammon

    In my opinion the GAR rules are complicated and difficult to follow in a NORH lap. They also seem to give rise to frequent disagreements/discussions or even arguments. I would strongly prefer a simple OWOOT NORH side competition. But if you guys prefer GAR, that is fine of course.

  5. Victor Narl

    @Zapper, you should have read the GAR rules here: https://zak.stunts.hu/articles/gar-rules-at-zakstunts . Section 3.44.4 of these rules clearly states that jumping inside a pipe is completely prohibited. Any jump, even the smallest one, always results in gaining an advantage in the air. Now we'll just wait for @Marco's official verdict on this replay of yours.

  6. Zapper

    @Viktor Narl, judging by what I can read and understand in Stunts Wiki's article about GAR (https://wiki.stunts.hu/wiki/GAR), on section 4.e: "Half-pipes: traverse the pipe without speeding-up using side-wall jumps". In that replay I cannot verify any supplementary acceleration due to any lift over surface of the pipe. Can you be more clear about this "clear violation" fact? Marco GAR video shows the difference between good and bad pipe usage ( can you clearly use one of those way of preforming trough pipe against how I drove on my lap?

  7. Victor Narl

    @Duplode, @Marco, in the following replay https://zak.stunts.hu/replays/6ae2c907a5915392b9b18701065cde818c3cc22f at the 1:33:10 mark, there is a clear violation of the GAR rules due to the jump gaining an air advantage in the Pipe element. Please pay attention to this and check the replay for GAR compliance. (doubled message)

  8. stanceboyCZ

    It's so beautiful

  9. stanceboyCZ

    @AlanRotoi Shocked

  10. Ryoma

    @Alan beautiful Fuego. I've got your car list in mind and try to not make a duplicate. For information and as a variant, I put in your Isdera the dashboard of Need For Speed 2.