News

  1. Victor Narl

    @Marco, thanks for checking the replay for AresUII. @Duplode, unfortunately, AresUII violated the GAR rules again when entering Corkscrew, so please remember to remove the GAR flag for AresUII's replay (2:00:67)

  2. Marco

    Yes sorry Dread, I'm becoming old Smiley. It's Not very comfortable to me to use the Forum but surely I can understand that this is not the best place to write poems Smiley. I try to check the forum yes

  3. dreadnaut

    Feel free to discuss this on the forum, where there might be more space and calm for reasoning

  4. Marco

    I tried a run paying much more attention to my initial corkscrew mind rule and I reminded why I thought it was too strictly and no sense Smiley . Because to pay attention to that, especially exiting, you have to almost go out of the track . Nothing, let's continue in this way paying attention to do not speed up that, anyway, means to stay close to my mind rule. Only real jumps and banked roads remain free to jump and speed up.

  5. Marco

    No, I'm wrong , regarding the very first front pixel of the car, both left and right, It seems I was good also with my "mind" in the fast replay. They are the tires of this trucks that are so big Smiley . Anyway my friends, if there something that you think must be rivisited or changed could be fine to me. We can discuss and decide

  6. Marco

    Sorry Ares ... regarding Gar rules, that entrance is clearly invalid Smiley)) . Anyway, Corkscrew, is an element that was hard to define in my GAR mind. My initial intention was to pretend that the first front right external pixel of the car clearly entered from the perpendicular middle line of the corkscrew track in entrance and the first front left external pixel of the car exited from the perpendicular line in exiting. Don't know if I'm clear enough, sorry. but it seemed to me too strictly at that time so that I push much more on the fact to avoid jump or speed up. Maybe It was not too bad my first intention. Usually I try to pay attention myself to respect "my mind rule" and stay on the perpendicular. In this case, I would declare my fastest lap invalid on both entrance and exiting with my mind rule for very few pixels . Uhmmmm ...

  7. Marco

    Thanks Dread for understanding and thanks Victor for accepting my apologies . Probably, because we are both from the same country, it's easier for Dread to understand my way to speak or to translate from italian. For all the others, I still ask sorry. About me, I'm not so experienced as you can think Victor in the sense that I don't know very much about extra tools, etc. known by the community. I was never interested in them because I simply like to play the game as it is. For example, I still build circuits with the inside editor, I don't use the "special" one . The only thing I like to do, that's not default of the game, is to use the addon cars done by Zapper, Ryoma , Alan etc that I love . I trust the community knowledge so, because the community teached me that there was no way to discover RH in NO-RH races, I inserted that particular "proof ability request" in GAR. I know it can sound extreme and for that reason is not mandatory. It was asked, in my memory, only 2 times in more than 10 years for very very fast racers. But I never imagined to ask anyone to quit GAR because of that, I would not. Privacy can be surely more important and also to do not let people angry is still more important.

  8. Victor Narl

    @Marco, in the following AresUII replay at 08.65 mark, a jump with an air advantage was obtained at the start of Corkscrew. I ask that this replay be verified for compliance with the GAR rule for Corkscrew. https://zak.stunts.hu/replays/256eb4baf4f29de0b2913b82f7c2ea447f78a223

  9. Victor Narl

    @MiDiaN, @Marco, another alternative is to replace video verification with mandatory use of the Stunts-NoRH version of the GAR rules, which can be downloaded here: https://ntt.mystunts.net/Stunts-NoRH.zip

  10. Victor Narl

    @MiDiaN, that's exactly why I no longer participate in the GAR league. Privacy is more important to me than interest in the competition. I would also suggest that @Marco ask @Duplode to make an official rule requiring mandatory video verification for the GAR league so that all riders are on a level playing field. P.S. I see that the times of "witch hunts" have come again.